The Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity Website and App

XXIV.h

XXIV - Interstitial lung disease - Pulmonary infiltrates - Pulmonary fibrosis

Pulmonary fibrosis

Last update 20/09/2020

(Fr: fibrose pulmonaire). The background incidence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has to be taken into account for causality assessment. Imaging at PMID 23672718. The diagnosis of interstitial pulmonary fibrosis�is raised in the presence of linear pulmonary opacities and architectural distortion on imaging incl. HRCT, restrictive lung dysfunction, low KCO, and hypoxemia obviating the need for a lung biopsy. Presentation can be chronic, subacute or rapidly progressive. Generally, the condition develops insidiously with dyspnea and bibasilar or diffuse reticular or streaky opacities. Honeycombing can develop with time in longterm survivors. DI-fibrosis may follow a classic episode of chemotherapy- or amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity. Separation of DI-fibrosis from idiopathic or CTD (viz. RA or scleroderma)-related fibrosis can be arduous (PMID 23791462).�Patients may exacerbate and progress to ARDS. DI-fibrosis may develop late after completion of therapy with chemo agents, irradiation or amiodarone with no evidence of toxicity during treatment or in the meantime. DI-fibrosis rarely occurs as a complication of patterns Ia, b or c. Oxygen and irradiation can trigger the onset of or exacerbate DI-fibrosis. When DI-fibrosis develops during treatment with the offending agent, drug withdrawal may translate into some improvement. Costicosteroid therapy is indicated, but the results are unpredictable

Causative drugs

22

Frequency - Incidence

Incidence of cardiac adverse event(s) due to the specific drug as assessed by number of reported/published cases in the literature. Red digits in stars indicate: 0 = Very rare, questionable signal · 1 = < 10 cases · 2 = 10-50 cases · 3 = 50–100 cases · 4 = 100-200 cases · 5 = >200 cases

Evidence level/grade

Evidence level for cardiac adverse event(s) due to the specific drug as estimated using Hill’s (1965), Naranjo’s (1981), and Bégaud’s (1985) criteria applied to published cases. Blue digits in stars indicate: 0 = Questionable · 1 = Low · 2 = Moderate · 3 = Robust · 4 = Definite · 5 = Unquestionable, pathognomonic

I.d
I.g
II.g
II.i
XI.b
XIV.h
XVI.e
XVI.i
XXII.b
XXII.d
XXIV.b
XXIV.d
XXIV.e
XXIV.f
XXIV.g
XXIV.k
XXIV.l
XXIV.m
XXIV.o
XXIV.p
XXIV.s
XXIV.aa
XXV.g
XXVI.b
XXVI.d
XXVIII.h
XXIX.d
XXX.o
XXX.p
XXX.r
XXXI.f
XXXI.g
XXXIII.k
XXXIII.y
XXXVI.f
XXXVI.p
XXXVIII.g
II.b
VI.a
VIII.a
XI.a
XI.i
XIV.f
XIV.l
XIV.o
XXI.c
XXIV.j
XXIV.n
XXIV.t
XXIV.ad
XXVIII.a
XXXIII.m
XXXVI.q
XXXVIII.n
XXXVIII.y
I.c
II.a
II.m
IV.a
V.a
V.e
VII.a
XII.b
XIV.i
XVI.h
XXI.a
XXIV.r
XXIV.ac
XXIV.ae
XXIX.i
XXX.h
XXXIII.f
XXXVI.v
II.n
XIV.a
XIV.d
XV.b
XV.e
XVI.c
XXIV.a
XXIV.c
XXIV.h
XXIV.ai
XXV.i
XXVIII.o
XXX.u
XXX.z
XXXVI.a
XXXVI.m
Loading more…